problem with forcing c2h symmetry


Just Got Here
Hi all,
I am having problems forcing symmetry on this small transition metal cluster. It looks like NWchem is not able to recognize symmetry (c2h) even if I change the tolerances, and if I force the symmetry I obtain a geometry far away from what obtained with different codes (e.g. turbomole).
I am interested on the excited states of this dimer, therefore symmetry could be very handy, but if I try to do excitations with random phase approx on the optimized geometry I get instability problems, while activating the cis flag for the Tamm-Dancoff approx. generates negative excitations.
I do not know if I am doing something wrong in the input, and I will appreciate any suggestion.


START tio2_opt_c2hb3
GEOMETRY
symmetry group c2h
Ti -0.7073194 1.1604688 0.0000000
Ti 0.7073194 -1.1604688 0.0000000
O 0.0415349 -2.6445686 0.0000000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 -1.2512390
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.2512390
O -0.0415349 2.6445686 0.0000000
END
BASIS
Ti library def2-TZVP
O library def2-TZVP
END
DFT
xc B3LYP
direct
iterations 200
END
TASK DFT optimize



Thank you in advance,
Enrico

Forum Vet
Hi Enrico,

There is indeed an issue with finding the symmetry for this system due to the way NWChem tries to find the symmetry.

In the mean time, the following geometry block will do what you want it to do:

GEOMETRY
symmetry group c2h
Ti 0.0000000 1.3590396 0.0000000
Ti 0.0000000 -1.3590396 0.0000000
O 1.3409217 -2.2797801 0.0000000
O -1.3409217 2.2797801 0.0000000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 -1.2512390
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.2512390
END


Bert



Quote:Eberardo Oct 26th 2:35 pm
Hi all,
I am having problems forcing symmetry on this small transition metal cluster. It looks like NWchem is not able to recognize symmetry (c2h) even if I change the tolerances, and if I force the symmetry I obtain a geometry far away from what obtained with different codes (e.g. turbomole).
I am interested on the excited states of this dimer, therefore symmetry could be very handy, but if I try to do excitations with random phase approx on the optimized geometry I get instability problems, while activating the cis flag for the Tamm-Dancoff approx. generates negative excitations.
I do not know if I am doing something wrong in the input, and I will appreciate any suggestion.


START tio2_opt_c2hb3
GEOMETRY
symmetry group c2h
Ti -0.7073194 1.1604688 0.0000000
Ti 0.7073194 -1.1604688 0.0000000
O 0.0415349 -2.6445686 0.0000000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 -1.2512390
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.2512390
O -0.0415349 2.6445686 0.0000000
END
BASIS
Ti library def2-TZVP
O library def2-TZVP
END
DFT
xc B3LYP
direct
iterations 200
END
TASK DFT optimize



Thank you in advance,
Enrico

Just Got Here
Thank you Bert for your fast reply.
I have been working on your modified geometry but I end up again in a c2h optimized structure that is highly deformed and gives negative excitations (possible conical intersection?).

autosym is not able to detect the c2h symmetry on your modified geometry, therefore if I optimize it with c1 symmetry I get this minimum (which is very similar to the one I obtain with different codes with and without symmetry):

Ti 0.00000312 1.29508791 -0.41023362
Ti -0.00000292 -1.29508723 0.41023465
O 0.00002610 -2.57710993 -0.59171972
O -0.00002665 2.57710896 0.59172361
O -1.25308248 0.00005145 0.00001102
O 1.25308283 -0.00005117 -0.00001593


when I optimize your modified geometry with c2h symmetry I get this distorted structure:

Ti -0.26744804 1.30749556 0.00000000
Ti 0.26744804 -1.30749556 0.00000000
O 1.44788061 -2.71073052 0.00000000
O -1.44788061 2.71073052 0.00000000
O 0.00000000 0.00000000 -1.26048208
O 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.26048208


I tried to reoptimize the c2h one with no symmetry and I end up in a structure very close to the first one with no symmetry.
I cannot understand what could be the source of this problem.


Thanks,
Enrico

Quote:Bert Oct 29th 10:40 am
Hi Enrico,

There is indeed an issue with finding the symmetry for this system due to the way NWChem tries to find the symmetry.

In the mean time, the following geometry block will do what you want it to do:

GEOMETRY
symmetry group c2h
Ti 0.0000000 1.3590396 0.0000000
Ti 0.0000000 -1.3590396 0.0000000
O 1.3409217 -2.2797801 0.0000000
O -1.3409217 2.2797801 0.0000000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 -1.2512390
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.2512390
END


Bert

Forum Vet
Enrico,

Did you look at the orbitals and orbital energies of the first energy calculation? You should see that the HOMO is much higher in energy than the LUMO. Hence the orbital ordering is wrong, which can happen. There are two approaches:

A. Before the "task dft optimize" line, add "set quickguess .true.". This avoids one diagonalization of the Fock matrix up front and gets you the right order.

B. You need to do a couple of dft energy calculations in which you swap the orbitals after the initial energy calculation.

I ran both approaches, they convergeimmediately (takes 1 step or so to see it is the converged geometry.

Bert


Quote:Eberardo Oct 30th 7:19 pm
Thank you Bert for your fast reply.
I have been working on your modified geometry but I end up again in a c2h optimized structure that is highly deformed and gives negative excitations (possible conical intersection?).

autosym is not able to detect the c2h symmetry on your modified geometry, therefore if I optimize it with c1 symmetry I get this minimum (which is very similar to the one I obtain with different codes with and without symmetry):

Ti 0.00000312 1.29508791 -0.41023362
Ti -0.00000292 -1.29508723 0.41023465
O 0.00002610 -2.57710993 -0.59171972
O -0.00002665 2.57710896 0.59172361
O -1.25308248 0.00005145 0.00001102
O 1.25308283 -0.00005117 -0.00001593


when I optimize your modified geometry with c2h symmetry I get this distorted structure:

Ti -0.26744804 1.30749556 0.00000000
Ti 0.26744804 -1.30749556 0.00000000
O 1.44788061 -2.71073052 0.00000000
O -1.44788061 2.71073052 0.00000000
O 0.00000000 0.00000000 -1.26048208
O 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.26048208


I tried to reoptimize the c2h one with no symmetry and I end up in a structure very close to the first one with no symmetry.
I cannot understand what could be the source of this problem.


Thanks,
Enrico

Quote:Bert Oct 29th 10:40 am
Hi Enrico,

There is indeed an issue with finding the symmetry for this system due to the way NWChem tries to find the symmetry.

In the mean time, the following geometry block will do what you want it to do:

GEOMETRY
symmetry group c2h
Ti 0.0000000 1.3590396 0.0000000
Ti 0.0000000 -1.3590396 0.0000000
O 1.3409217 -2.2797801 0.0000000
O -1.3409217 2.2797801 0.0000000
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 -1.2512390
O 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.2512390
END


Bert

Just Got Here
I see...
with the "set quickguess t" line I managed to converge with b3lyp the c2h symmetry, which now is very close to the c1 structure.
I tried to change functional and use cam-b3lyp, but I had the same problem (mixing of orbitals with the LUMO being lower in energy of the HOMO) even when I included the set quickguess line in my input. To solve this I read in the orbitals from the b3lyp run and I got the right ordering of the orbitals for the cam-b3lyp calculation.
Bert, thank you very much for your support!


Enrico


Forum >> NWChem's corner >> Running NWChem