Thanks for the help.
I have been running some of the test from the QA directory, then parsing the output and diff them. So, for instance 6.8 compiled with Intel 17 would produce some fails, but also 6.6 patched and compiled with Intel 17. All those results are also different from the output produced with 6.6 and Intel 16...
So, the question is, should I assume that the last version (6.8) compiled with an up to date compiler (Intel 17) would produce the right (or close to) outputs? Here I show part of the output of diff -w autosym.6.8.out.nwparse autosym.out.ref.nwparse
87,88c87,88
< P.Frequency 1692 1692 1692 1909 1909 3436
< P.Frequency 3718 3718 3719
---
> P.Frequency 1692 1692 1692 1909 1909 3463
> P.Frequency 3719 3719 3719
91,94c91,94
< Frequency 0 0 0 287 306 462
< Frequency 1692 1692 1692 1909 1909 3436
< Frequency 3718 3718 3719
< Zero-Point correction to Energy = 33.557
---
> Frequency 0 0 0 292 292 292
> Frequency 1692 1692 1692 1909 1909 3463
> Frequency 3719 3719 3719
> Zero-Point correction to Energy = 33.597
96,97c96,97
< P.Frequency 1692 1692 1692 1909 1909 3436
< P.Frequency 3718 3718 3719
---
> P.Frequency 1692 1692 1692 1909 1909 3463
> P.Frequency 3719 3719 3719
or
diff -w dft_s12gh_6.8.out.nwparse dft_s12gh.out.ref.nwparse
50,52c50,52
< Frequency -36 -36 -17 169 196 200
< Frequency 1057 1680 1681 3530 3681 3685
< Zero-Point correction to Energy = 21.889
---
> Frequency -37 -37 -24 -17 37 37
> Frequency 1053 1679 1679 3529 3661 3661
> Zero-Point correction to Energy = 21.805
54c54
< P.Frequency 1056 1682 1682 3530 3683 3686
---
> P.Frequency 1053 1679 1679 3529 3661 3661
How serious is this? If so, what can be done?
|