NWChem vs Gaussian energies


Click here for full thread
Just Got Here
Dear all,
I'm a NWChem newbie and I'm performing single point calculations on a water geometry with both NWChem and Gaussian. I'm working at the DFT level, using the BP86 exchange-correlation functional and the 6-311G* basis set. It may seem really trivial, but I can't get comparable energies (i.e. equal to the 7-8th digit) from the two programs. I also tried following the suggestions posted here: http://comp.chem.umn.edu/info/NWChem.html with little change. Here are my input files:

NWChem
title "w sp"

geometry
O             0.00000           0.00000           0.00000
H             0.92264           0.65241           0.00000
H            -0.92264           0.65241           0.00000
end

charge 0

scf
 singlet
 rhf
end

dft
 xc slater 1.0 becke88 nonlocal 1.0 perdew86 1.0 vwn_1_rpa 1.0
 iterations 5000
 grid lebedev 90 14 ssf euler
end

basis "ao basis" spherical
 o library 6-311g*
 h library 6-311g*
end

task dft

ecce_print w_dft


Gaussian
%nproc=4

# bp86/6-311g* scf=(tight) nosym integral(grid=ultrafine)

w sp

 0 1
O             0.00000           0.00000           0.00000
H             0.92264           0.65241           0.00000
H            -0.92264           0.65241           0.00000


The energies I get are:

NWChem  :  -76.600926730992
Gaussian:  -76.4024349388


which are indeed very different. The same happens if I change the functional to B3LYP, even if the difference is much less dramatic.
I am probably doing something wrong but I don't understand what. Do you have any suggestions?

Thank you