| 11:58:00 AM PST - Thu, Feb 9th 2012 |
|
Quote:Edoapra Feb 9th 6:17 pmMarcin,
Thank you for your suggestion.
The sub-sub version numbering you are mentioning refers to RPMs, PKGs, etc ..., while we are simply releasing a source code tarball. We are think of releasing source RPMs and I think your suggestion would be appropriate in that context.
Edo
Quote:Marcindulak Feb 9th 2:54 amCould you when making changes to the source release it as 6.1.1 etc?
This will help to avoid confusion about which version people are referring to,
and it's a standard practice for installed software by package managers, like yum , yast, apt-get.
They recognize that a new version is available by comparing versions.
The problem with not changing the tarball is that we will not know which version it is used.
I mean shall we start using something like nwchem-6.1-before-Feb.-8 or nwchem-6.1-post-Feb.-8?
I believe that Marcindulak suggestion is sensible.
Thanks a lot, anyway, for your continuum support.
Best regards,
Rafael R. Pappalardo
|